Waterfront Tiny Home near Boston
-------------------------------------------
The end is near? If 2.6 Billion People Go To War: India vs. China!! - Duration: 8:06.
The end is near? If 2.6 Billion People Go To War: India vs. China!!
A hypothetical war between India and China would be one of the largest and most destructive conflicts in Asia.
A war between the two powers would rock the Indo-Pacific region, cause thousands of casualties on both sides and take a significant toll on the global economy.
Geography and demographics would play a unique role, limiting the war's scope and ultimately the conditions of victory.
India and China border one another in two locations, northern India/western China and eastern India/southern China, with territorial disputes in both areas. China attacked both theaters in October 1962, starting a monthlong war that resulted in minor Chinese gains on the ground.
Both countries' "No First Use" policies regarding nuclear weapons make the outbreak of nuclear war very unlikely. Both countries have such large populations, each over 1.3 billion, that they are essentially unconquerable.
Like all modern wars, a war between India and China would be fought over land, sea, and air; geography would limit the scope of the land conflict, while it would be the air conflict, fought with both aircraft and missiles, that would do the most damage to both countries.
The trump card, however, may be India's unique position to dominate a sea conflict, with dire consequences for the Chinese economy.
A war between the two countries would, unlike the 1962 war, involve major air action on both sides. Both countries maintain large tactical air forces capable of flying missions over the area.
People's Liberation Army Air Force units in the Lanzhou Military Region would fly against Punjab, Himchal Pradesh and Uttarakhand and from the expansive Chengdu Military region against India's Arunachal Pradesh.
The Lanzhou district is home to J-11 and J-11B fighters, two regiments of H-6 strategic bombers, and grab bag of J-7 and J-8 fighters.
A lack of forward bases in Xinjiang means the Lanzhou Military Region could probably only support a limited air campaign against northern India.
The Chengdu Military Region is home to advanced J-11A and J-10 fighters but there are relatively few military airfields in Tibet anywhere near India.
Still, China does not necessarily need tactical aircraft to do great damage to India. China could supplement its aerial firepower with ballistic missiles from the People's Liberation Army Rocket Forces.
The PLARF overseas both nuclear, conventional and dual-use ballistic missiles, and could conceivably move up to two thousand short- and medium-range DF-11, DF-15 and DF-21 ballistic missiles into positions adjacent to India.
These missiles could be used to blitz Indian strategic targets on the ground, at the cost of making them unavailable for contingencies in the South and East China Seas.
Meanwhile, India's air forces are in a better position to contest the skies than their Chinese counterparts. While the war would take place on China's sparsely manned frontier, New Delhi is only 213 miles from the Tibetan frontier.
India's air fleet of 230 Su-30Mk1 Flankers, sixty-nine MiG-29s and even its Mirage 2000s are competitive with or even better than most of China's aircraft in theater, at least until the J-20 fighter becomes operational.
India likely has enough aircraft to deal with a two-front war, facing off with Pakistan's Air Force at the same time. India is also fielding the Akash medium-range air defense missile system to protect air bases and other high-value targets.
While India could be reasonably confident of having an air force that deters war, at least in the near term, it has no way of stopping a Chinese ballistic-missile offensive.
Chinese missile units, firing from Xinjiang and Tibet, could hit targets across the northern half of India with impunity.
India has no ballistic-missile defenses and does not have the combined air- and space-based assets necessary to hunt down and destroy the missile launchers. India's own ballistic missiles are dedicated to the nuclear mission and would be unavailable for conventional war.
The war on the ground between the Indian and Chinese armies might at first glance seem like the most decisive phase of the war, but it's actually quite the opposite.
Both the western and eastern theaters are in rugged locations with little transportation infrastructure, making it difficult to send a mechanized army through. Massed attacks could be easily stopped with artillery as attacking forces are funneled through well-known valleys and mountain passes.
Despite the enormous size of both armies (1.2 million for the Indian Army and 2.2 for the Chinese Army) fighting on the ground would likely be a stalemate with little lost or gained.
The war at sea would be the decisive front in a conflict between the two countries. Sitting astride the Indian Ocean, India lies on China's jugular vein.
The Indian Navy, with its force of submarines, aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya and surface ships could easily curtail the the flow of trade between China and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
It would take the Chinese Navy weeks to assemble and sail a fleet capable of contesting the blockade. Even then, the blockade would be hard to break up, conducted over the thousands of square miles of the Indian Ocean.
-------------------------------------------
Thousands evacuated from homes near Houston - Duration: 1:47.
For more infomation >> Thousands evacuated from homes near Houston - Duration: 1:47. -------------------------------------------
Zverev survives near upset from American wildcard - US Open 2017 - Duration: 3:52.
Zverev survives near upset from American wildcard - US Open 2017
Think of it: its your US Open debut and second professional match.
The veteran across the net comes at you having earned a career-high 21 wins in 2017 and can count a Grand Slam victory over one-time Open winner and former world No. 1 Andy Murray to his credit.
If the circumstances or fans standing on tip-toe at Court 12 hoping to see an American pull off an upset at all flummoxed wild card Thai-Son Kwiatkowski, it wasn't apparent early in his match against No.
And it wasn't apparent late in the match, either — until the 22-year-old from Charlotte, N.C., had been up 5-3 in the fourth set, on the verge of taking the match.
Instead, he found himself needing to serve to stay in the set at 5-6. An easy volley miss and another error gave Zverev the set and the Russian survived to eke out the five-set win, 7-6, 4-6, 4-6, 7-5, 6-3.
While perhaps a bit crestfallen, Kwiatkowski, the University of Virginia product who earned his wild card by winning the NCAA singles tournament, didn't disappoint fans in extending the match the distance and turning Zverev's methodical, looping groundstrokes and serve-and-volley game into an entertaining chess match.
The high point of the outing came after he ripped a forehand passing shot to save the one of five match points: a fist pump wasnt enough as the crowd bellowed.
so the upstart dropped to the ground and gave them a few emphatic pushups. The almost three-and-a-half-hour contest was close throughout.
After narrowly losing the first set in a tiebreak, Kwiatkowski had willfully forged through the left-hander's quirky serve-and-volley game to take the second and third sets after he seemed to get a beat on how to find room to pass Zverev.
In fact, Kwiatkowski often borrowed from the vets playbook late in the match, moving into the net and cutting off angles with sharp volley winners.
In the end, though, it was Zverev who found just a little distance on a few key points to get the win.
WHY IT MATTERS: After playing a nearly impeccable first set, Zverev, the 30-year-old German - whose younger brother, Alexander, is a trendy favorite to win this US Open - managed to show his experience and workmanlike game to eke out the win.
But the result, while surely disappointing for Kwiatkowski, wasn't all bad: he showed he belongs in a Grand Slam as he seeks a permanent spot on the tour.
MATCH POINT: Zverev might get used to five-set matches: he rallied from two sets down at the Australian Open to defeat John Isner 9-7 in the fifth set after four hours and 10 minutes.
-------------------------------------------
Teen recovering after being shot near Manchester park - Duration: 1:30.
For more infomation >> Teen recovering after being shot near Manchester park - Duration: 1:30. -------------------------------------------
99 near Olive shut down due to police activity - Duration: 1:06.
For more infomation >> 99 near Olive shut down due to police activity - Duration: 1:06. -------------------------------------------
Zverev survives near upset from American wildcard ( Monday, August 28, 2017 ) ./ - Duration: 2:31.
Think of it: its your US Open debut and second professional match. The veteran across the net comes at you having earned a career-high 21 wins in 2017 and can count a Grand Slam victory over one-time Open winner and former world No. 1 Andy Murray to his credit.
If the circumstances or fans standing on tip-toe at Court 12 hoping to see an American pull off an upset at all flummoxed wild card Thai-Son Kwiatkowski, it wasn't apparent early in his match against No. 23 Misha Zverev. And it wasn't apparent late in the
match, either — until the 22-year-old from Charlotte, N.C., had been up 5-3 in the fourth set, on the verge of taking the match. Instead, he found himself needing to serve to stay in the set at 5-6. An easy volley miss and another error gave Zverev the set and the Russian survived to eke out the five-set win, 7-6, 4-6, 4-6, 7-5, 6-3.
While perhaps a bit crestfallen, Kwiatkowski, the University of Virginia product who earned his wild card by winning the NCAA singles tournament, didn't disappoint fans in extending the match the distance and turning Zverev's methodical, looping
groundstrokes and serve-and-volley game into an entertaining chess match. The high point of the outing came after he ripped a forehand passing shot to save the one of five match points: a fist pump wasn't enough as the crowd bellowed. so the upstart dropped to the ground and gave them a few emphatic pushups.
The almost three-and-a-half-hour contest was close throughout. After narrowly losing the first set in a tiebreak, Kwiatkowski had willfully forged through the left-hander's quirky serve-and-volley game to take the second and third sets after he seemed to get
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét