Chủ Nhật, 1 tháng 4, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Apr 1 2018

Hi everyone, it's Justine! This is a question asked by one of you under one

of my videos: why do men wear trousers and women

skirts? where is that coming from? it's a great question... you would say, well, it's

culture, that's the way people in Western Europe/countries dress, right? but in fact, as for

many matters of culture we need to go way back in time to find the answer. at

the beginning everyone wore skirts. in Egypt, everyone from the Pharaoh high up

in the hierarchy until the simple farmer was wearing skirts. you know about linen, you

know this fine paper and those fine fabrics from Egypt - that was for everyone.

in China, the emperor would wear a floor-length dress in bright yellow,

usually made in beautiful, beautiful silk. in South America, the Inca civilization...

men and women were wearing skirts as well. in ancient Greece and in Rome, men

and women wore tunics, so a sort of dress dress draped around the body together with a

cape. and the whole thing was held on the shoulder with a fibula, a sort of clasp, a

brooch. you see some in museums now. so men's dresses were shorter women's were

longer (more around the ankle) but everyone was working around in skirts

and it was fine. they would even see skirts as proper clothing, as opposed to

what the barbarian people around them were wearing, like people in Byzantium,

people of Carthage and my super rough barbarian ancestors the Gauls, later called...

the French :-) those are different examples from all around the world and from

different moments in time but you can see that pretty much everywhere and

untll pretty recently, skirts were fine for everyone... so when did that shift

happen? when did pants become the only garment acceptable for a man?

the influence of the Bible: in the Bible, this subject is mentioned as well: the woman

shall not put on the weapons or the armor of the warrior, neither shall the warrior

put on a woman's garment, for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

this is believed to be the correct meaning because in the time when the Old

Testament was written, years and years and centuries before year zero of

our calendar, women and men would go to war, in ancient civilizations. so what the

text here says is believed to be:we people who believe in God and follow the

Bible are not going to do it like this. in our culture, only the men will go to

war. and the other way around men should not try to escape going to war by

putting on women's garments. that's what we now believe it meant. then in 1604,

a long time ago, King James 1 of England ordered the Bible to be

translated again, newly, into English. the way in which this version was written is

a lot easier to follow, a lot easier to read than the original version... but also

in some places it's either inaccurate or freely translated. to make it easier

sometimes they interpreted the original text. but it was so much easier to read that

it became extremely popular among all english-speaking Protestants all around

the world and that's the version that really "sticked", so to say. the King James

version of the Bible says: the woman shall not wear that which pertaineth

unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment, for all that do so are

abomination unto the Lord thy God. so it's already a lot more general. and then

a newer version was done in modern international English and that one says:

a woman must not wear men's clothing, nor a man wear women's clothing, for the Lord

your God detests anyone who does this .now this refers to all clothes in general! it

became more and more general with every translation, but that's the meaning that

was kept in the end. so from that moment on, it really wasn't okay for men to wear

skirts. then men's fashion and women's fashion we became more and more

different and more and more separated. but beyond the biblical influence there

were also practical reasons: trousers are just smarter to work, ride horses or go

to war - things that men did. Women on the other hand were not expected to do

much, and in women's fashion for many many centuries practicality was not really a

concept. also it was easier in a skirt to use the restroom, because women need to

sit down at least squat. when they had their periods, sometimes they would wear

a rag between their legs, to catch the blood, but fabric was expensive so most

of the times they wouldn't wear anything. and in a skirt it was easier to clean

yourself several times a day without staining your outfit. also in a time

when birth control did not exist, women spent more of their lives pregnant. so a

skirt can be shifted up or down, a dress is more forgiving... pants just won't

fit anymore, hence the need for pregnancy trousers nowadays. and now? now in most

Western countries, if a man walks down the street in a skirt or a dress, he will

probably get laughed at very badly it's ingrained in our education, our

principles, our culture... but in many other parts of the world, right now, men still

wear skirts or dresses. and when you travel there as a tourist,

it doesn't bother you at all does it?examples: in Bhutan, the equivalent of

dressing up for work or for events is to wear a kira for the ladies and a gho

for the gentlemen. I think it looks terribly chic. if it gets cold, they just

add thick socks underneath, going up to knee. and this fold in the front serves as a

huge pocket. if you thought that Bhutanese men all have a belly in the

front, it's actually the stuff they're carrying around with them. and that beats

any purse ;-) Buddhist monks wear long dresses

everywhere in Asia: does that look weird? not at all! it looks incredibly elegant!

on Bali, men wear a sarong, so a long wrapped

piece of clothing. it's a skirt and they wear it with their sandals or

flip-flops. this length is usually between the knee and the ankle, from what

I've seen there. it's actually a perfect length to cover what needs to be covered

but still have great freedom of movement. let's talk about Scotland please: I think

a man in a kilt looks amazing. usually the fabric of the kilt is a work

of art in itself: it's nicely woven, tight, thick fabric and the folds are

always absolutely impeccable. why don't more men wear skirts?

thumbs up if you enjoyed this video, thank you VERY MUCH! and thank

you to the person who raised that question, I love questions like this!

if you're interested in fashion and style in general, subscribe to my channel and

click on that belt so that you'll get the information when I upload a new video.

I will see you in the next one, until then: take care,

bye!

For more infomation >> Why men wear pants and women wear skirts ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 7:07.

-------------------------------------------

Why Do You Get Hangry? - Duration: 3:43.

This episode of SciShow is sponsored by Snickers.

It's not.

Though it should be!

Get on it, Snickers!

[♪INTRO]

It's happened to the best of us.

It's close to dinner time, your stomach is grumbling...

All of a sudden your significant other's foot tapping becomes too much to bear, and

you lash out.

Your partner has fallen victim to hanger, the grumpiness you feel when you are hungry.

And it isn't an excuse—it's an actual physiological and psychological phenomenon.

Science has shown that hanger is real.

For example, people jab more pins into a voodoo doll of their spouses or choose to blast loud

noises at their partner when their blood glucose levels are low.

Psychologists think that this may be because hunger impairs self-control.

Not acting impulsively takes brainpower, and when the brain's low on fuel, it just doesn't

have the energy to hold back.

Another explanation is that hanger is basically a mistake your brain makes when you're not

sure what's causing your body to feel bad.

That's because some psychologists think feeling emotions is actually a combination

of what's physically going on in your body and what your mind thinks is the reason for

that.

So if you don't realize what's making you feel off, you might pick a different emotion.

When you haven't eaten in a while, you might attribute your rumbling stomach, tiredness

and fuzzy-head to other feelings that cause those reactions, like stress or even anger.

No really — this is a thing.

Scientists have shown that this can happen.

For example, experimenters in a 2016 study irked 236 college students by making the computer

they were using crash.

Those that had fasted before the test reacted more negatively, seeming to add their hunger-related

feelings to the frustration induced by the tech glitch.

They even reported more hatred towards the experimenter.

Hatred!

And that might sound extreme, but it's an honest mistake, because hunger and anger look

a lot alike physiologically.

Some of the same brain regions are activated both when you feel angry and when you're

hungry.

And that's because the same brain chemical—a tiny protein called neuropeptide Y—both

prompts your body to eat when your energy reserves are low and regulates aggression.

Actually, it makes a lot of sense, because hunger is your brain's way of signaling

the release of hormones that increase the amount of glucose into your bloodstream so

that your tissues don't starve.

And those same hormones are released in stressful situations, when a boost of glucose could

help you outmuscle a predator or run away.

And the connection between hunger and aggression might be more than a bodily coincidence.

For our ancestors, food wasn't always a reliable thing.

Their feelings of hunger were a sign that food was scarce, so whatever they found when

hungry was probably worth fighting for.

Being hangrier, and thus more aggressive about securing meals, might have helped them get

the fuel they needed to outcompete more complacently hungry rivals.

And the legacy of that hanger lives on in us today.

So the next time you feel yourself about to bubble over with frustration, remember: it

may be your body's way of decoding your empty stomach.

So go eat a snack!

But not a Snickers.

Yet.

Thanks for asking, and thank you to our actual President of Space today, who would just like

us to say that it's "Not SR Foxley."

It's usually SR Foxley, but this time it isn't, and that's the only thing that

this person wanted us to say.

Without our Patreon patrons, like SR Foxley and also Not SR Foxley, we wouldn't be able

to make SciShow and answer all of your maddening questions about the universe.

Thank you to all those people.

Everyone except Snickers.

[♪OUTRO]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét