Auto news on Youtube Dec 31 2018

I'm Derek Johnson with tatango.com, and I'm answering the question, 'What's

the difference between Tatango and an SMS aggregator?'

So first, let's start off with what Tatango is.

Tatango is a software provider that provides software to send and receive text messages

or MMS messages.

An SMS aggregator is strictly a developer tool that allows you to connect to the wireless

network, so AT&T, T Mobile, Verizon, those different wireless carriers, and allows you

to send and receive text messages with those carriers.

So both companies, an SMS aggregator and a company-software provider like Tatango, are

very different actually.

We use, at Tatango, an SMS aggregator to send and receive messages through the wireless

carriers, but most SMS aggregators don't have a software layer that allows marketers

to build and manage SMS marketing campaigns.

So you really need kind of both if you're interested in running a text message marketing

campaign.

You need to use a software provider who uses an SMS aggregator that then will get your

messages to the wireless carriers.

So really most of the time, you're using both at the same time.

It's not a choice between one or the other.

So hopefully, that answers the question, 'What is the difference between Tatango and an SMS

aggregator? '

For more infomation >> What is the Difference Between Tatango and an SMS Aggregator? - Duration: 1:32.

-------------------------------------------

Mufti Nadeem New Speech|Difference Between Jashne and Mission E Melad - Duration: 34:53.

For more infomation >> Mufti Nadeem New Speech|Difference Between Jashne and Mission E Melad - Duration: 34:53.

-------------------------------------------

English Tutor Nick P. Lesson (301) The Difference Between Notorious and Infamous - Duration: 5:51.

Hi this is tutor Nick P and this is lesson 301. Today we're going to look at

the difference between notorious and infamous. Actually this one really is

more difficult than usual. Because clearly both words mean famous for

something bad and I do even think that there's a lot of even native speakers

that you kind of use them interchangeably and don't see much of a

difference. But from research I can find some subtle differences where some

might be more likely to be used in one situation than another. So that's what

I'll cover here. All right. Well first of all, of course, notorious means you know

well-known for something bad. Something discreditable you know, something that

would bring down your reputation basically. Make your reputation or your

image seem worse. Let's continue here. Some dictionaries claim notorious is

more likely to use for people in the present time. So if you're still alive

right now and you're talking about somebody that's still alive right now,

like a notorious a bank robber for example. We'd probably be more likely to

say a notorious bank robber than an infamous bank robber. That's , that's you

know robbing banks right now in the present time or the recent past. Not too

long ago. Okay. Infamous tends to be used more for former times. You know maybe

more like a hundred or several hundred years ago or possibly even thousands of

years ago. It's a little more likely. So there's some subtle differences where

you're more likely to see one than the other. But again since it's so close and

so since a lot of native speakers almost think of them as the same. Don't be

surprised if you see examples that would go against what they say here. Okay. Let

me continue. Though some other experts claim infamous is stronger and that it

carries a connotation of evil or wicked. Remember connotation that means those

are feelings that's connected to the word. So I think in situations where

we're saying somebody's famous for something bad

in kind of an evil or wicked way. infamous would be more likely used

That's what they're saying. When using infamous , the speaker is often

making a moral judgment too. That they're judging how terrible they are. Some

dictionaries claim infamous is more literary than notorious. It means that

you're more likely to see it written than spoken.

That's what literary means. So you'll see it in older articles or written articles.

You know, old books or historical documents or whatever than notorious . And

let's look at some examples which would you know, reflect the these, these notes

or these tips here. She is notorious for being late. All right. Well this is probably

present time. This is bad. It's, it hurt somebody's reputation, not particularly

evil. So we wouldn't normally say she is infamous for being late. We're a little

more likely to say she is notorious for being late. Lawyers are notorious for not

being truthful, even though to be honest that's probably part of their job too.

But still they got a bad reputation for that and a lot of people often joke

about how you can't trust lawyers and lawyers always lie. Okay. And again

this is a little more likely to be present time too The Paris Metro is

notorious for pickpockets. Yeah. It's got a bad reputation. That it's had a lot of

pickpockets over the years on the Metro, on there you known Subway's system. So

again, this is more like present time. This is also bad. This is a crime. I don't

know if I would put it in the I don't think I'd say the wicked or evil

category. But it's still bad. It still hurts somebody's reputation. Let's look

at number four. Dracula or Vald the Impaler. Yeah. This is actually some

people say this is where I guess Brahm Stroker. Was he the first one that

wrote the first Dracula ? Where he kind of got the name from. This, this was actually

a real prince who was very , very evil. Vlad the Impaler.

I think he used to like to impale his victims I think he crucified them and

stabbed them. And they were stories about where maybe he might like drink some of

their blood and dip bread in their blood. So yeah. That sounds a bit evil and

really pretty terrible. So you might you would you might be a

little more likely to use infamous and he was hundreds of years ago too. It was a

long time ago. So for several reasons infamous would probably be more likely

to be used here. So Dracula or Vlad the Impaler was infamous for the way he

tortured his enemies or killed them. mm-hmm And the last one here. Benedict Arnold was

an infamous traitor. Yeah. This was during the Revolutionary War.

Benedict Arnold was always famous for that. So somebody might be making a moral

judgment against him.He betrayed the country. Betrayed you know, the people he

was supposed to be with so again and this was also you know hundreds at least

about you know , several hundred years ago. So okay. Well anyway, I hope you can see

somewhat of a difference like I said it's a little tough because in even in

some native people's minds they don't often see a big difference between these

two. But these are just some hints where one is more likely to be used than the

other. Anyway, I hope you got it. I hope it's clear. Thank you for your time. Bye-bye.

For more infomation >> English Tutor Nick P. Lesson (301) The Difference Between Notorious and Infamous - Duration: 5:51.

-------------------------------------------

The Difference Between Ranking on Google vs YouTube | Neil Patel - Duration: 5:43.

Has anyone ever told you that you can rank

both on Google and YouTube,

and get double the amount of search traffic?

It's not always double, but it's a lot more search traffic

than you're getting right now.

Hi everyone, I'm Neil Patel,

and today I'm going to share with you

the difference on ranking on Google and YouTube.

(harmonious music)

Before I get started,

make sure you subscribe to this channel.

Follow, subscribe, whatever it may be,

that way when I give more marketing advice like this,

you'll get notified.

The first difference for you is

Google SEO takes a lot longer than YouTube SEO.

Did you know on YouTube SEO, that if you're gonna rank

you typically rank in the first 24 to 48 hours?

And which when a video does extremely well

in the first day on YouTube,

it does well for the life of the video.

On Google, on the other hand,

if you create a web page or you create a brand new website,

and you optimize it,

you're not gonna get ranking on day one.

You're lucky if you get rankings

in the first three to six months,

it typically takes over a year before you see results.

So the big difference is YouTube, first 24 hours

determines how the video is going to do in the long run.

With Google, what happens in the first year

determines how its going to do in the long run.

The second difference I have for you is authority.

How many of you actually knew that

both YouTube and Google look at authority?

If you knew that, just leave a comment below with yes.

But there's a difference.

With Google, the more authoritative your site is

the more you rank for everything.

YouTube is very similar, but the difference is

your authority in YouTube fluctuates month-over-month.

With Google, if you build links,

you'll continually keep climbing in authority.

Doesn't always mean you're gonna get more search traffic,

it just means over time, year-over-year,

you should in theory do better.

With YouTube, one month you could have amazing authority

and just crush it, but the next month if you release

seven videos and they're all duds and no one likes em,

your authority drastically tanks

and all your videos don't do as well,

compared to what they were performing before.

So with YouTube, you have to continually fight

and keep that authority and redoing everything,

in which you have to keep creating new amazing content,

you have to keep creating amazing engagement,

without that your authority just keeps dying.

But with Google, it keeps going up as you build more links.

The third difference is Google and YouTube

look at two totally different factors

to really determine rankings.

Google looks at links.

The more websites that link to your website,

the better off you're gonna do.

If you don't know how to build links,

the first thing you wanna do

is go find all the people that link to your competitors

and ask em to link to you.

You can use ahrefs.

They have a tool, or technically ahrefs is a tool

but they have a feature, more-or-so within ahrefs,

called Link Intersect.

You can put in your top three competitors and your domain,

and it'll show you all the people that link

to your top three competitors that don't link to you.

This is important because if you reach out to a site

that only links to one of your hundred competitors,

it's really hard to convince em to link to you.

But if you find a site that links to three

of your major competitors, you know at that point

that they're open to linking to you as well.

So you wanna reach out to all of the people

that link to your competitors.

With YouTube, it's all about engagement,

it's not about links.

The longer the watch time,

not just the watch time on your video,

but all the other videos on YouTube,

in which if someone watches a video from your channel

and then watches some other random person's video,

that helps counter your video's score.

So the more engagement you create on YouTube,

the better off you are.

That's why you wanna tell people to like, comment, share,

just like I'm telling you

make sure you subscribe to this channel,

like the videos, comment, it all helps.

And similar to number three,

number four is all about engagement.

Both YouTube and Google love engagement,

but the engagement is different.

With Google, they're looking at how many people

perform a search, click over to your site,

and stay and click over to other pages

versus bouncing back and clicking the back button

and going to the next listing in Google.

If people stay on your site, it tells Google that

hey, they may have found what they're looking for.

With YouTube, engagement isn't measured by bouncing,

it's measured by view time, comments, likes, even dislikes.

Yes, you may not want dislikes, but it still is engagement.

YouTube wants those kind of signals

versus Google wants people to stick around

on your website and not hit the back button.

With YouTube, if someone watches your video

and then they watch someone else's video,

and then another random person's video, it still helps you.

With Google, if someone's on your website,

bounces back and goes to someone else's site after,

that definitely doesn't help you.

And as for the last difference,

well YouTube is easy to rank for, and Google is hard.

In which, anytime you create content or a site,

it'll take you three, six months, a year,

and I know I'm giving you a lot of ranges

with how long it takes to get results on Google,

but that's because some industries

are more competitive than others, but on YouTube

you can see results in the first 30 days, I kid you not.

It's wide open, especially in the English market

or even outside of the United States,

it really is wide open.

I know there's tons of videos on YouTube,

probably over a billion, but trust me, it's wide open.

If you guys started leveraging YouTube right now,

I bet you if you were about to create a brand new website,

and a brand new YouTube channel,

you're more likely to get more search traffic from YouTube

over the next two years than you are from your own website.

That's it. Thank you for watching.

If you enjoyed this video, make sure you subscribe,

like, share it, and of course if you have any questions,

leave a comment below. Thank you for watching.

For more infomation >> The Difference Between Ranking on Google vs YouTube | Neil Patel - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

HOW ARE YOU MAKING A DIFFERENCE - Duration: 0:43.

I volunteer at PAVE and TACID I write a blog and the blog is about self-identity

when you have multiple disabilities and health mental health when you have

multiple disabilities basically the perspectives that I've been through I

mentor for the Tacoma youth chorus I help the kids like learn what part of

the music they are it makes me feel happy because I'm helping other kids

learn