Auto news on Youtube Mar 27 2018

Hi this is our first video of the channel

I will tell you where we are and what we are doing here.

Why did we choose this place to live

Atlantic Ocean, Canary Islands, Tenerife, Los Cristianos in the south of the island

Tenerife belongs to Spain and the European Union.

There is never winter here.

The touristic season is all year round.

In the south of the island it's normally 10 degrees warmer than in the north.

Population 1 milion.

Plus about 150 000 tourists.

The official language is Spanish but in the south there are many foreigners,

that's why you can speak English here.

In Tenerife there is a sleeping volcano that is the highest mountain in Spain.

In the winter it is often covered with snow, while on the beaches people are sunbathing.

What do we do here?

We spend a lot of time underwater.

We work in a diving center.

In our free time, of course, we dive.

But we also visit interesting places and do different activities.

This is our dive center.

Office desk TV, our students watch the video here

Some equipment for sale Neoprene suits and boots

More suites, fins, regulators BCDs

Kitchen corner Tanks

And compressor room.

Outside we do the briefing and prepare for diving

here we wash and dry the diving equipment

On this channel we will show you our life in Tenerife.

Do not forget to subscribe and watch the Dive Center Daily Live.

For more infomation >> Why do we call it paradise? - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

Why is Brazil called Brazil - A Dica do Dia - Duration: 0:50.

Hello! My names is Regula and I'm a student at Rio & Learn,

in Rio de Janeiro.

Today we are going to talk about why Brazil is called Brazil.

It's called Brazil because of this tree here.

When the Portuguese arrived, they cut this tree and discovered its red color,

so Pau-Brasa means Ember wood.

It later changed to Pau-Brasil which then ended being Brasil (Brazil) the name of this country.

This, folks, is why Brazil is called Brazil!

See you soon here at Rio & Learn!

Later!!

For more infomation >> Why is Brazil called Brazil - A Dica do Dia - Duration: 0:50.

-------------------------------------------

Why Do Some Drugs Make Your Pupils Wider? - Duration: 3:18.

[ ♪ Intro ]

Whether or not eyes are the windows to the soul... scientifically, pupils are the

windows of the eyes.

And sometimes, those windows are more open than usual, like when you've taken a medication

that causes pupil dilation.

Or when people use certain recreational drugs.

It all comes down to how different chemicals can cause changes throughout your whole body,

which can affect little muscles in your eyes.

The pupils are openings that let light into the rest of your eye.

And the colored part of your eye, the iris, controls how much light makes it in.

The balance of two muscle groups in the iris changes how big your pupils are, like a camera aperture.

The iris dilator is arranged like bicycle spokes around the center of your eye.

And when it contracts, it pulls your pupils open wider.

The iris sphincter, on the other hand, is in a ring around your pupil and acts like

most of the sphincter muscles in your body.

It constricts your pupils down to little dots.

So now you know that you've got a sphincter in your eye.

That's just a fact for you.

Anything that blocks or stimulates either muscle can knock that balance out of whack

and cause some really noticeable changes.

For example, drugs that block receptors for the neurotransmitter acetylcholine can cause

impressive dilation.

These medications are designed to inhibit the parasympathetic nervous system, which

controls the involuntary muscle contractions that keep things moving in your body, like

your lungs, or the plumbing that gets rid of waste.

This system also controls the iris sphincter muscle.

So when it's inhibited, the iris sphincter can't counteract the pull from the iris

dilator — and you get wide open, 'blown out' pupils.

Some drugs, like ones for overactive bladders or excessive sweating, target the entire parasympathetic

nervous system.

They often have dilated pupils or blurry vision as side effects, but those aren't the goal.

Others, like the drops used to dilate pupils for eye exams, are more targeted and don't

throw your whole body off.

Now, other drugs can stimulate the sympathetic nervous system, responsible for your body's

'fight-or-flight' response.

And these too can cause dilation.

Take adrenaline, which floods your bloodstream when you're scared but is also a medication

for extreme allergic reactions — it's what's in the EpiPen.

Adrenaline can bind to nerve receptors connected to the iris dilator, making it contract and

pull your pupils open wide.

If people use drugs like cocaine, amphetamines, or even weed, their brains have more dopamine

and norepinephrine floating around.

Usually, either extra neurotransmitters get released, or receptors that naturally suck

them away get blocked by those drugs.

These chemicals are involved in the "high" feeling but also cause dilated pupils.

Scientists think that dopamine makes certain nerve cells release more norepinephrine, which

works like adrenaline to make the iris dilator contract.

So wide pupils can be caused by a lot of things.

But they're a hint that certain chemicals — illicit or not — are bubbling through

your body.

Thanks to our Patreon patrons for asking us great questions like this!

If you want to support us and send us questions, and get some other cool stuff you can go to

patreon.com/scishow.

And if you want to learn more about human eyes, check out our video where I explain

what those pesky little eye floaters actually are.

[ ♪ Outro ]

For more infomation >> Why Do Some Drugs Make Your Pupils Wider? - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

Do you really know why you do what you do? | Petter Johansson - Duration: 16:11.

So why do you think the rich should pay more in taxes?

Why did you buy the latest iPhone?

Why did you pick your current partner?

And why did so many people vote for Donald Trump?

What were the reasons, why did they do it?

So we ask this kind of question all the time,

and we expect to get an answer.

And when being asked, we expect ourselves to know the answer,

to simply tell why we did as we did.

But do we really know why?

So when you say that you prefer George Clooney to Tom Hanks,

due to his concern for the environment,

is that really true?

So you can be perfectly sincere and genuinely believe

that this is the reason that drives your choice,

but to me, it may still feel like something is missing.

As it stands, due to the nature of subjectivity,

it is actually very hard to ever prove that people are wrong about themselves.

So I'm an experimental psychologist,

and this is the problem we've been trying to solve in our lab.

So we wanted to create an experiment

that would allow us to challenge what people say about themselves,

regardless of how certain they may seem.

But tricking people about their own mind is hard.

So we turned to the professionals.

The magicians.

So they're experts at creating the illusion of a free choice.

So when they say, "Pick a card, any card,"

the only thing you know is that your choice is no longer free.

So we had a few fantastic brainstorming sessions

with a group of Swedish magicians,

and they helped us create a method

in which we would be able to manipulate the outcome of people's choices.

This way we would know when people are wrong about themselves,

even if they don't know this themselves.

So I will now show you a short movie showing this manipulation.

So it's quite simple.

The participants make a choice,

but I end up giving them the opposite.

And then we want to see: How did they react, and what did they say?

So it's quite simple, but see if you can spot the magic going on.

And this was shot with real participants, they don't know what's going on.

(Video) Petter Johansson: Hi, my name's Petter.

Woman: Hi, I'm Becka.

PJ: I'm going to show you pictures like this.

And you'll have to decide which one you find more attractive.

Becka: OK.

PJ: And then sometimes, I will ask you why you prefer that face.

Becka: OK.

PJ: Ready? Becka: Yeah.

PJ: Why did you prefer that one?

Becka: The smile, I think.

PJ: Smile.

Man: One on the left.

Again, this one just struck me.

Interesting shot.

Since I'm a photographer, I like the way it's lit and looks.

Petter Johansson: But now comes the trick.

(Video) Woman 1: This one.

PJ: So they get the opposite of their choice.

And let's see what happens.

Woman 2: Um ...

I think he seems a little more innocent than the other guy.

Man: The one on the left.

I like her smile and contour of the nose and face.

So it's a little more interesting to me, and her haircut.

Woman 3: This one.

I like the smirky look better.

PJ: You like the smirky look better?

(Laughter)

Woman 3: This one.

PJ: What made you choose him?

Woman 3: I don't know, he looks a little bit like the Hobbit.

(Laughter)

PJ: And what happens in the end

when I tell them the true nature of the experiment?

Yeah, that's it. I just have to ask a few questions.

Man: Sure.

PJ: What did you think of this experiment, was it easy or hard?

Man: It was easy.

PJ: During the experiments,

I actually switched the pictures three times.

Was this anything you noticed?

Man: No. I didn't notice any of that.

PJ: Not at all? Man: No.

Switching the pictures as far as ...

PJ: Yeah, you were pointing at one of them but I actually gave you the opposite.

Man: The opposite one. OK, when you --

No. Shows you how much my attention span was.

(Laughter)

PJ: Did you notice that sometimes during the experiment

I switched the pictures?

Woman 2: No, I did not notice that.

PJ: You were pointing at one, but then I gave you the other one.

No inclination of that happening?

Woman 2: No.

Woman 2: I did not notice.

(Laughs)

PJ: Thank you.

Woman 2: Thank you.

PJ: OK, so as you probably figured out now,

the trick is that I have two cards in each hand,

and when I hand one of them over,

the black one kind of disappears into the black surface on the table.

So using pictures like this,

normally not more than 20 percent of the participants detect these tries.

And as you saw in the movie,

when in the end we explain what's going on,

they're very surprised and often refuse to believe the trick has been made.

So this shows that this effect is quite robust and a genuine effect.

But if you're interested in self-knowledge, as I am,

the more interesting bit is,

OK, so what did they say when they explained these choices?

So we've done a lot of analysis

of the verbal reports in these experiments.

And this graph simply shows

that if you compare what they say in a manipulated trial

with a nonmanipulated trial,

that is when they explain a normal choice they've made

and one where we manipulated the outcome,

we find that they are remarkably similar.

So they are just as emotional, just as specific,

and they are expressed with the same level of certainty.

So the strong conclusion to draw from this

is that if there are no differences

between a real choice and a manipulated choice,

perhaps we make things up all the time.

But we've also done studies

where we try to match what they say with the actual faces.

And then we find things like this.

So here, this male participant, he preferred the girl to the left,

he ended up with the one to the right.

And then, he explained his choice like this.

"She is radiant.

I would rather have approached her at the bar than the other one.

And I like earrings."

And whatever made him choose the girl on the left to begin with,

it can't have been the earrings,

because they were actually sitting on the girl on the right.

So this is a clear example of a post hoc construction.

So they just explained the choice afterwards.

So what this experiment shows is,

OK, so if we fail to detect that our choices have been changed,

we will immediately start to explain them in another way.

And what we also found

is that the participants often come to prefer the alternative,

that they were led to believe they liked.

So if we let them do the choice again,

they will now choose the face they had previously rejected.

So this is the effect we call "choice blindness."

And we've done a number of different studies --

we've tried consumer choices,

choices based on taste and smell and even reasoning problems.

But what you all want to know is of course

does this extend also to more complex, more meaningful choices?

Like those concerning moral and political issues.

So the next experiment, it needs a little bit of a background.

So in Sweden, the political landscape

is dominated by a left-wing and a right-wing coalition.

And the voters may move a little bit between the parties within each coalition,

but there is very little movement between the coalitions.

And before each elections,

the newspapers and the polling institutes

put together what they call "an election compass"

which consists of a number of dividing issues

that sort of separates the two coalitions.

Things like if tax on gasoline should be increased

or if the 13 months of paid parental leave

should be split equally between the two parents

in order to increase gender equality.

So, before the last Swedish election,

we created an election compass of our own.

So we walked up to people in the street

and asked if they wanted to do a quick political survey.

So first we had them state their voting intention

between the two coalitions.

Then we asked them to answer 12 of these questions.

They would fill in their answers,

and we would ask them to discuss,

so OK, why do you think tax on gas should be increased?

And we'd go through the questions.

Then we had a color coded template

that would allow us to tally their overall score.

So this person would have one, two, three, four

five, six, seven, eight, nine scores to the left,

so he would lean to the left, basically.

And in the end, we also had them fill in their voting intention once more.

But of course, there was also a trick involved.

So first, we walked up to people,

we asked them about their voting intention

and then when they started filling in,

we would fill in a set of answers going in the opposite direction.

We would put it under the notepad.

And when we get the questionnaire,

we would simply glue it on top of the participant's own answer.

So there, it's gone.

And then we would ask about each of the questions:

How did you reason here?

And they'll state the reasons,

together we will sum up their overall score.

And in the end, they will state their voting intention again.

So what we find first of all here,

is that very few of these manipulations are detected.

And they're not detected in the sense that they realize,

"OK, you must have changed my answer,"

it was more the case that,

"OK, I must've misunderstood the question the first time I read it.

Can I please change it?"

And even if a few of these manipulations were changed,

the overall majority was missed.

So we managed to switch 90 percent of the participants' answers

from left to right, right to left, their overall profile.

And what happens then when they are asked to motivate their choices?

And here we find much more interesting verbal reports

than compared to the faces.

People say things like this, and I'll read it to you.

So, "Large-scale governmental surveillance of email and internet traffic

ought to be permissible as means to combat international crime and terrorism."

"So you agree to some extent with this statement." "Yes."

"So how did you reason here?"

"Well, like, as it is so hard to get at international crime and terrorism,

I think there should be those kinds of tools."

And then the person remembers an argument from the newspaper in the morning.

"Like in the newspaper today,

it said they can like, listen to mobile phones from prison,

if a gang leader tries to continue his crimes from inside.

And I think it's madness that we have so little power

that we can't stop those things

when we actually have the possibility to do so."

And then there's a little bit back and forth in the end:

"I don't like that they have access to everything I do,

but I still think it's worth it in the long run."

So, if you didn't know that this person

just took part in a choice blindness experiment,

I don't think you would question

that this is the true attitude of that person.

And what happens in the end, with the voting intention?

What we find -- that one is also clearly affected by the questionnaire.

So we have 10 participants

shifting from left to right or from right to left.

We have another 19 that go from clear voting intention

to being uncertain.

Some go from being uncertain to clear voting intention.

And then there is a number of participants staying uncertain throughout.

And that number is interesting

because if you look at what the polling institutes say

the closer you get to an election,

the only people that are sort of in play

are the ones that are considered uncertain.

But we show there is a much larger number

that would actually consider shifting their attitudes.

And here I must point out, of course, that you are not allowed to use this

as an actual method to change people's votes

before an election,

and we clearly debriefed them afterwards

and gave them every opportunity to change back

to whatever they thought first.

But what this shows is that if you can get people

to see the opposite view and engage in a conversation with themselves,

that could actually make them change their views.

OK.

So what does it all mean?

What do I think is going on here?

So first of all,

a lot of what we call self-knowledge is actually self-interpretation.

So I see myself make a choice,

and then when I'm asked why,

I just try to make as much sense of it as possible

when I make an explanation.

But we do this so quickly and with such ease

that we think we actually know the answer when we answer why.

And as it is an interpretation,

of course we sometimes make mistakes.

The same way we make mistakes when we try to understand other people.

So beware when you ask people the question "why"

because what may happen is that, if you asked them,

"So why do you support this issue?"

"Why do you stay in this job or this relationship?" --

what may happen when you ask why is that you actually create an attitude

that wasn't there before you asked the question.

And this is of course important in your professional life, as well,

or it could be.

If, say, you design something and then you ask people,

"Why do you think this is good or bad?"

Or if you're a journalist asking a politician,

"So, why did you make this decision?"

Or if indeed you are a politician

and try to explain why a certain decision was made.

So this may all seem a bit disturbing.

But if you want to look at it from a positive direction,

it could be seen as showing,

OK, so we're actually a little bit more flexible than we think.

We can change our minds.

Our attitudes are not set in stone.

And we can also change the minds of others,

if we can only get them to engage with the issue

and see it from the opposite view.

And in my own personal life, since starting with this research --

So my partner and I, we've always had the rule

that you're allowed to take things back.

Just because I said I liked something a year ago,

doesn't mean I have to like it still.

And getting rid of the need to stay consistent

is actually a huge relief and makes relational life so mush easier to live.

Anyway, so the conclusion must be:

know that you don't know yourself.

Or at least not as well as you think you do.

Thanks.

(Applause)

For more infomation >> Do you really know why you do what you do? | Petter Johansson - Duration: 16:11.

-------------------------------------------

Why do I have to pay $25 every year for child support services? - Duration: 1:03.

Under federal law, the California Department of Child Support Services is

required to charge a yearly $25 service fee for certain cases.

If the fee applies to you, you will receive an "Annual Service Fee Assessment Notice" in October

for each case for which the fee applies.

The fee is only charged on child support cases that meet all of the following conditions:

The family receiving child support payments has never received government assistance benefits such as;

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), Tribal TANF, CalWorks

or Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and

The parent receiving support has received $500 or more in child support payments

during the previous federal fiscal year (October 1 - September 30) and the parent receiving child support

has not already paid a child support annual fee in another state

For more infomation >> Why do I have to pay $25 every year for child support services? - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

[EngSub] Why do you give a wry smile ? / Making music in 1 min / KORG Gadget for Nintendo Switch 4/4 - Duration: 4:05.

whose piano?

cute

lovely

key is C ?

what is this?

I want to go there

this is it ?

it's wrong

what a terrible tune...

replay

whose piano?

i want to change it to...

ummmm what shall I do?

we have two Marseilles (Gadget)

wooow an exciting lineup

oh it is wrong

Oh it's cool!

cool ! cool !

why do you give a wry smile?

I want to play more

absolutely

For more infomation >> [EngSub] Why do you give a wry smile ? / Making music in 1 min / KORG Gadget for Nintendo Switch 4/4 - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

Why is Long Term Growth an easily Misunderstood Indicator? Jeremy Sheppard - Duration: 2:58.

Hi I'm Jeremy Shepherd and I'm talking about Long Term Growth.

This is an indicator that we use in our research to help us uncover top growth locations for

our clients to invest in.

The Long Term Growth, or LTG for short, is the compound annual growth rate over the last

ten years for a property market.

So if the LTG is 6% it means that there has been 6% growth each year, compounded over

the last ten years.

It's ironic that it's called Long Term Growth when ten years is probably a minimum hold

period for most property investors – but that's what the industry's branded it, so

we call it the LTG.

Interpreting the LTG is where it gets tricky so pay attention guys.

I regularly see people interpreting the LTG around the wrong way.

What do you think is more important — a high LTG or a low LTG?

Well, actually, it turns out that a high LTG represents recent booming, recent high growth,

and it's unlikely that this high growth — this above-average growth — is going to continue

into the next few years.

So, it's actually a low LTG that outperforms.

I've done some research and found that from five years ago, the LTG high-performers underperformed

over the next five years, and the LTG low-performers outperformed.

So it's around the other way — you want a low LTG to forecast future high capital

growth, not the other way around.

There can be some problems with this.

For example: an LTG that's negative or zero, or very low like 1%, could indicate a market

with problems and those should be avoided.

The sweet spot seems to be around 3 or 4%; but definitely below the long-term national

average growth rate of around about 6%.

This links back to some of the other videos about other metrics I've spoken about, such

as Market Cycle Timing and Ripple Effect Potential — a market cannot continually have above-average

growth forever.

Eventually, neighboring markets will be so much more appealing because they are so much

more affordable.

It can't carry on forever.

There are surges of growth, followed by flat periods of growth; and the LTG is an indicator

of that phenomenon.

That's why you need to chase after low LTG markets not high LTG markets.

This is not the only indicator we use — there are heaps of other indicators you need to

look at if you're going to conduct your own research.

We certainly do.

You can check out all of them in our research page.

Thanks very much for watching.

Please leave your comments below: