Thứ Hai, 28 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 29 2018

What makes an animated show great?

What separates a great cartoon and a mediocre animated series that fails to capture viewers,

especially young kids', imaginations and attention?

Why have shows like Spongebob, Ed, Edd, n Eddy, and Scooby Doo have had such a huge

influence on pop culture and have still remained as relevant and beloved as ever?

It's a lot of important aspects: from the animation itself and just well done and beautiful

it is to look at, from the writing and characters (which applies to pretty much any move and

TV show), and the worldbuilding.

But most importantly, a great cartoon has to strike the balance between being whimsical

and appealing to children, while containing mature and unanced underlying themes that

can teach both kids and adults some valuable lessons.

Hence why a series like Rick and Morty is so popular and well received.

Having said all of that, this is exactly why I believe Avatar: The Last Airbender is the

greatest animated show ever made.

It works on multiple levels and is a perfect amalgamation of a lot of vital, fantastic

moving parts that make one heck of a series.

One the surface, Avatar is just so easy on the eyes.

The crisp animation, character detail, art style, the grand and imaginative locations,

and zany character and creature designs is second to none.

A prime example is Appa, Aang's flying bison.

This creature is a cross between a buffalo and a manatee, and the design is simplistic

but memorable.

App sticks with you years after you've finished watching the show.

This one example applies to nearly everything visually on the series, from Aang and the

way the airbenders are depicted, to the snowy landscapes and igloos the water benders occupy.

Plenty of work went into the art design, with painstaking detail, and it definitely shows.

It's a world you want to live in, occupy, and read about.

Each region/civilization is wildly different from one another, each with their own distinct

architectures, locations, strengths, and weaknesses.

Then there's the lore and storytelling, which is top notch as well.

To put it bluntly, Avatar is epic.

In my opinion, it can rival the likes of Lord of the Rings or Star Wars because of just

how in-depth the show's lore is.

It's so grand and well done that Avatar even had a highly successful and beloved spinoff

series in Korra, which lasted for four seasons.

The story of the water, air, earth, and fire benders, who all control the elements with

martial arts, has become iconic and even influential.

Since its debut in 2005, Avatar has inspired so much content, from games, to tv shows,

and movies.

And that influence will only keep getting stronger and more relevant as time goes on.

The overarching plot itself is perhaps the most impressive and important aspect of the

show.

The premise is simple but fascinating: water bending siblings discover the next avatar,

Aang, and he has to go on a quest to learn all four elements.

The characters are multilayered, nuanced, complex, and interesting.

Aang is a loveable protagonist, and so are his friends Katara, Sokka, Toph.

Then there's arguably the best character in the series, Prince Zuko.

He starts out as the main villain: a young, naive, power hungry warlord essentially hellbent

on stopping Aang.

But then he gradually evolves becomes sympathetic, with the audience and beginning to understand

what he's going through, telling one of the greatest redemption stories ever in any

form of entertainment, and that's saying a lot.

And even beyond Prince Zuko, almost the entire cast of characters have outstanding story

arcs.

We see a different side to Katara when meets the man she believes killed her mother and

uses bloodbending, perhaps the darkest form of bending on the show, to get on his knees.

Toph teaches Aang, and the audience, a whole different aspect to bending and adds a lot

to the overall mythology.

She shows Aang what you can really accomplish with bending and how she's able to control

her powers and use her earthbending to "see."

Then there's the touching and heartbreaking arc involving Zuko's uncle Iroh and how

he lost his son during battle, and why he went into exile.

We learn about the price of war through his story.

The whole conflict and story beats centering on the fire nation just grows and more complex

as the show itself slowly matures with each season.

Avatar has everything a show, let alone a kid's cartoon, needs to have in order to

be great.

There's plenty of comedy, stunning and exciting action, drama, a deep and thought-provoking

story, worldbuilding and lore that rivals the best of the best in the fantasy genre,

and most important of all, relatable and loveable characters.

There are plenty of great animated shows out there, but Avatar remains king.

For more infomation >> Why Do We Love Scooby-Doo? - Video Essay/Analysis - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

When The Internet Is Out - Duration: 1:21.

*depressed boy*

What's wrong, Dan?

Phone isn't working

Ya, that's 'cause the internet's out.

THEN BRING IT BACK IN!

*HA, I get it.*

First of all, dude, have a mint.

*Shoves whole mint with wrapper into his mouth*

Second of all, there are a lot of other things to be doing in this room besides being on your phone.

AAAH!

Whoa!

*being idiotically amazed at all the simple things in his room*

OH MY GOSH!!! WHAT IS THAT!!

Wot?

RIGHT THERE NEXT TO YER FOOT! IT'S INCREDIBLE!!!

I don't see anything.

RIGHT

HERE!!!

You mean the floor?

I've never seen this before!!

You are acting really stupid right now.

I've never felt like this before! This is incredible!

The world is open now. I can do things. I can create. I can help people.

There's nothing that is gonna keep me from changing the world.

Oh, the internet's back on

*Back on the phone*

You're pathetic

*Watch another vid or subscribledeedibble*

*I mean. Unless you don't want to. I mean, that's cool I guess.*

*please do*

For more infomation >> When The Internet Is Out - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

What baby monkeys doing why do like this to her?|All babies in Amber are so happy|Monkey Daily 891 - Duration: 10:34.

For more infomation >> What baby monkeys doing why do like this to her?|All babies in Amber are so happy|Monkey Daily 891 - Duration: 10:34.

-------------------------------------------

Why Do We Need Digital Identities? | Blockchain Central - Duration: 6:31.

What is up everyone?

Welcome back to Blockchain Central!

My name is Blu and in today's episode we'll investigate

how digital identity can be handled by the blockchain.

Before we start, as always, please note that this content does neither represent financial,

legal, or tax advice, nor is it supposed to be understood or interpreted as solicitation

to buy or sell any securities, coins or tokens.

An interesting byproduct with the rise of cryptocurrencies, or cryptoassets, how they

are often referred to now, is the fact, that people start thinking about what money actually is.

Why money has value?

Often it's said that bitcoin doesn't have any inherent value, but paper money does.

Well, if so, what is it that gives paper money inherent value?

Curiously enough, similar questions can be raised when it comes to digital identity.

Digital identity?

Let me explain...

It's a digital object that maps to a physical entity.

Wait what?!

Ok, let's break that down!

A physical entity can be a person for example.

Linked to that person can be a bank account number, or an ID number, or any other information,

which then represents what we call the digital object.

The physical entity can also be an institution or even a device.

So when we think about the Internet of things for a second, where all devices will act in

an autonomous way, it becomes extremely important that every device has a digital identity.

How are digital identities managed today?

Often we use so-called 'federated identities'.

A third party 'identity provider' like Facebook or Google handles the 'mapping'

from digital object to physical entity.

What's mapping?

The connection from physical entity to digital object.

Let's say, a new account is set up on Facebook, for example.

Facebook then checks the email address, maybe the ID card and therefore makes a connection

from the person to the digital account.

With that identity it's then possible to log in to many other applications, bypassing

the process of repeating registration.

If this system works, why is there a need for anything else?

Well, let's think about a couple of its shortcomings:

First of all, identity ownership.

At the moment, digital identities are owned by pretty much anyone, except for the user,

as is the case with with Google, Facebook and the government, for instance.

As these identities are stored on central servers, they are always prone to hacking.

I think everyone either had their account hacked on a social media platform or at least

knows someone whose account got compromised.

Billions of dollars are spent each year to set up and maintain high security standards.

What we're more conscious of is the fact that at this point in time, the user is hardly

in possession and not even in control of his or her own data.

The recent Facebook scandal where data of up to 87 million users was sold to a researcher

working at Cambrigde Analytica, showed this in a painful way.

Another problem with digital identities at the moment is, that we have lots of them.

As some require a password with capital letters, numbers and so on, many people have their

super secure master password (great!), which they use for a multitude of accounts

(not so great!).

Updating information on this multitude of accounts, for example after having moved,

is a tedious, time consuming task!

Essentially, the question arises of what's a suitable solution for these shortcomings.

Some say, it can be a self-sovereign identity.

Imagine, there was the possibility of an identity, owned by the user himself.

The data and the reputation linked to that identity would also be held by the user.

All in one place.

The user could decide whom to give access to the data and would profit himself by selling

data to third parties.

Lots of talking!

But how could this self-sovereign identity thing work?

There are several projects in the making,

aiming to develop an infrastructure and setting up such an identity program.

uPort, Civic and Sovrin are some projects worth looking into!

Let's assume, that such a Decentralized App is developed.

The user then creates their identity on the mobile phone using the DApp.

It's like setting up an account.

The difference is, that the user is not granted access to this identity by a third party provider,

but he actually holds the private keys to this identity.

That means, the user is in total control of the identity.

For more information on public and private keys, watch the video 'Wallets – make

the right decision'.

The user then adds attributes to their identity, like the birth date for example.

These attributes get attested by some authority.

For example, a state institution will add a birth certificate as attestation to the user's account.

A bank can, after the user underwent an ordinary registration, add the attestation that the

user is allowed to open a bank account.

Opening a second bank account with another bank could be carried out easily then: The

user doesn't have to register again.

All they need to do is send the encrypted attestation of them being allowed to open

a bank account to the second bank.

No extra registration, no giving away of data, easy and quick access.

With these attestations, like shown in the bank account example,

the user can disclose data selectively.

Imagine someone buying a bottle of wine.

The shop owner actually doesn't need to know the address and the full name of the

buyer (which is the case when the user shows his ID card in the shop at the moment)

if he wants to know if the user is a legitimate buyer.

He only needs to get the confirmation of him/her being legally allowed to buy the bottle.

With this identity, the user can also sign and verify transactions easily and therefore

transfer ownership of all kinds of digital assets.

Money is only one application.

Digital assets can also be land titles, energy, or even a vote in the future.

The possibilities are endless.

Those of you who are familiar with private keys might wonder, what happens if the user

loses his/her phone and therefore the private key?

Identity gone?!

Forever?

No.

The identity can be restored through chosen nodes in the network of the user.

These can be relatives, friends or institutions, for instance.

The user notifies his network about his lost phone and therefore the identity and the network

nodes will confirm this loss, triggering the restoration of it.

Lots of new terms, lots of new concepts.

We hope you enjoyed this little excursion into digital identities!

Check out the other videos, hit that like button, share it with others and don't forget

to subscribe to Blockchain Central to never miss a beat!

Happy investing!

For more infomation >> Why Do We Need Digital Identities? | Blockchain Central - Duration: 6:31.

-------------------------------------------

Why Do We All Need To Drink Wheatgrass Juice Daily │ Health Benefits of Wheatgrass Juice - Duration: 3:03.

Health Benefits Of wheatgrass.

Wheatgrass is one of Natures purest of elixirs.

As the name implies, it is part of the wheat family, however, it does not contain gluten.

This is because wheatgrass has been sprouted and no longer carries gluten or other allergic

agents.

That means that it�s benefits can be enjoyed by celiacs and other gluten intolerance sufferers

alike.

In this video we are talking about best 5 Health Benefits Of wheatgrass.

So please click the subscribe batton and press the bell icon for more videos.

Number 1.

Weight Loss.

Many people have started adding wheatgrass juice to their diet as a quick and convenient

way to boost weight loss.

Wheatgrass contains thylakoids, which are tiny compartments found in plants that contain

chlorophyll and absorb sunlight for photosynthesis.

While there is no evidence that wheatgrass itself could increase weight loss, several

studies have found that supplementing with thylakoids could enhance satiety and increase

weight loss.

Number 2.

Lowers Cholesterol In High Fat Diets.

cholesterol as well as a positive improvement in good . It also dilates the blood pathways

which reduces blood pressure.

The study also showed a significant rise in the appearance of Vitamin C and glutathione.

Glutathione is one of our bodies most powerful antioxidants and is concentrated mostly in

the liver, making it an essential part of the body's natural detoxifying processes.

Number 3.

Reduce Cholesterol.

Cholesterol is a waxy substance found throughout the body.

While you need some cholesterol to make hormones and produce bile, too much cholesterol in

your blood can block blood flow and increase your risk of heart disease.

Several animal studies have found that wheatgrass may help lower cholesterol levels.

In one study, rats with high cholesterol were given wheatgrass juice.

Number 4.

Kill Cancer Cells.

Thanks to its high antioxidant content, some test-tube studies have found that wheatgrass

may help kill cancer cells.

According to one test-tube study, wheatgrass extract decreased the spread of mouth cancer

cells by 41%.

Some research indicates that wheatgrass juice may also help, when combined with traditional

cancer treatment, minimize adverse effects.

Number 5.

Really Hungry.

OK, so I should tell you that I decided my daily wheatgrass shot would be my breakfast.

Don't ask me why I did this when I easily could have downed it along with my usual peanut

butter-topped apple.

I guess I thought that having wheatgrass on an empty stomach would be the best way to

feel the effects.

But I have to admit, I've made better decisions in my life.

For more infomation >> Why Do We All Need To Drink Wheatgrass Juice Daily │ Health Benefits of Wheatgrass Juice - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Why Is The 100 Returning June 5? | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:19.

Why Is The 100 Returning June 5? | Heavy.com

The CW Why is The 100 taking a week off?.

Tongiht's episode of The 100, "Shifting Sands," was phenomenal.

It was fast-paced, multi-layered, and incredible.

But it also left fans with one sad revelation: we aren't getting a new episode next week. The 100 isn't returning until June 5.

Do we have any idea why?.

Unfortunately, at this time we don't know exactly why the show is taking a week off.

However, we have a pretty good guess.

It's likely due to a combination of the Memorial Day holiday and planning for July Sweeps.

The CW hasn't made an official announcement about why the show is taking a week off, as of the time of publication.

One possible reason is because of Memorial Day.

The holiday is on May 28.

That means The 100 might not want to air a new episode the day after the holiday.

It doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's certainly one possibility.

There don't appear to be any major sports events happening on May 29 that would compete with the show.

And nothing major is airing on The CW either next week, just a rerun of The 100.  In fact, we scanned through all the major events happening on TV that night and didn't see anything major. So more than likely, it's a decision partially based on the holiday that ends the day before.

It might also have to do with May and July Sweeps. The CW often builds hiatuses strategically into its series to make sure they can take advantage of sweeps.

Last year, for example, The CW put The 100 on a three-week break in April because of Sweeps.

This year, May Sweeps took place from April 26 – May 23.

That means that tonight's episode was the last major episode of The 100 during May Sweeps (and they picked a good one.).

So The CW might also be planning for July Sweeps.

Typically the season ends before July Sweeps happens, but because the show started later this year, The CW will actually be able to air the show during summer sweeps, which is June 28-July 26. Each season of The 100 has 13 to 16 episodes.

That means we still have at least eight weeks or two months of episodes left.

The CW likely wants to make sure they air some of their best episodes during July Sweeps, thus the one week hiatus.

For more infomation >> Why Is The 100 Returning June 5? | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:19.

-------------------------------------------

England's batting: Why is it so bad and what can they do about it? - Duration: 12:49.

England's batting: Why is it so bad and what can they do about it?

Jonny Bairstow was one of three England batsmen who were bowled on the first day of the international summer. The statistics dont lie.

England have not won any of their past eight Tests and the nine-wicket defeat by Pakistan at Lords was the first time they had lost in May since 1921. They cannot blame luck or the conditions.

They won the toss and the greenish pitch was ideal for Englands excellent seam and swing attack, although for some reason Joe Root elected to give Pakistan the first bowl on it under classic overcast skies.

But that was not the reason England were so heavily beaten. They were utterly outplayed in all departments by a Pakistan side featuring only four players who had previous experience of a Test in England.

Roots team were defeated - as they have been 13 times in the past 22 Tests - because they cannot bat.

In that time they have been dismissed 24 times for less than 300, the bare minimum for a total in five-day cricket. Why is the batting so bad and how can they fix it?.

What exactly is the problem?. There is no permanence about England batsmen. Apart from Alastair Cook, no-one is prepared to knuckle down and grind out runs in an unattractive but effective way.

When I told Cook he looked good making 70 in Englands first innings, he regarded it almost as a criticism. He does not want to be pleasing on the eye; he wants to make monumental scores.

Cook is the only batsmen happy with a low-risk strategy. He chips away at the bowling in small chunks rather trying to take great whopping slices off it.

He makes runs because he knows it his duty to do so. He is not out there for fun.

Most modern English batsmen instinctively like to dominate - this is what they have been conditioned to do. It is more enjoyable and more entertaining, but it also much riskier.

England have given debuts to 12 batsmen since 2014. Their combined average is 26. Contributions like that are not going to win Test matches. Where have the hundreds gone?.

It is ironic that the ECBs shiny new tournament is called the Hundred because it is individual hundreds that England are lacking.

England managed only three centuries in last winters five-match Ashes series. The Australians made 10. England scored only five in seven Tests against South Africa and West Indies last summer.

The trend is evident at county level too: no batsman has scored 10 hundreds in a season - or 2,000 runs - since Mark Ramprakash in 2007.

Cook, Englands all-time leading run-scorer, has compiled 104 fifties and 61 hundreds in first-class cricket, an impression conversion rate of 59%.

However, of his top-order colleagues in the first Test, Mark Stonemans conversion rate is 42%, Dawid Malan 41%, Jonny Bairstow 40% and Ben Stokes 44%. Even Joe Roots, Englands best batsman, is only at 40%. It is a problem with technique?.

The current generation of batsmen, many of whom are reared on limited-overs cricket, like to go at the ball without properly moving their feet towards it.

They will try to drive balls that are not half-volleys, backing their eye - and the non-swinging white ball - to hit it cleanly.

That is not so easy against high-class international bowlers armed with the red Duke ball, which can move prodigiously in the air and off the pitch.

In the last Test for example, Jonny Bairstow was bowled in both innings. Each time the ball moved late in the air.

But if he had been playing defensively rather than attempting a forced shot, he would have had more chance of survival.

The one-day generation have developed lazy habits. They rarely get properly forward or back with their feet, adopting what is known in the trade as a half-cock position. This makes them more susceptible to the fullish delivery that seams or swings late.

Mark Stoneman, who made four and nine at Lords, has been dropped for the second Test. The side-on image of Stoneman being bowled in Englands first innings illustrates the point.

His weight is not fully forward, his right knee is straight rather than bent and he is pushing out in front - leaving a gap between bat and pad which the ball sneaked through.

Techniques like this are fallible to skilful full-length bowling from craftsmen who are able to make the ball deviate off the seam. South Africas Vernon Philander exploited this flaw last year and Pakistans Mohammed Abbas is the same type of bowler.

What else are England doing wrong?.

The deeper issue is a mental one. Dogged occupation of the crease, eschewing high-risk shots, purely staying in when the bowling is very challenging or the conditions awkward - these are not skills ingrained in English players.

Roots Test hundreds usually last four hours, Cooks typically take six. But watch the England players practise in the nets before a game and it will not be long before they attempt attacking shots.

Batsmen generally bat for 30 minutes, facing the England pace attack or the local academy seamers or spinners.

There will be the odd 15-minute session when they try to bat roughly at the tempo of a Test, but the net environment is not suitable to rehearse lengthy periods of abstinence.

Coach Trevor Bayliss, who said after the first Test that you almost throw your hands up sometimes at Englands repeated collapses, takes a back seat during practice, standing at the back observing.

Occasionally his assistants Mark Ramprakash or Paul Farbrace will make a comment to a player, but they keep them to a minimum.

Some players are cross when they are dismissed in the nets - Root, for example - but others do not seem to mind so much.

England captain Joe Root bats in the nets at Headingley, the venue for the second Test. One-day cricket and the flat-pack mentality.

Chopping and changing formats regularly during the season also makes it hard for batsmen to acquire the necessary concentration levels required for Test cricket.

The recalled Keaton Jennings comes in for the second Test on the back of five 50-over matches for Lancashire. Despite making two championship centuries this season, he will not have played a four-day innings for almost three weeks.

You get out of the habit of building an innings brick by brick. You want to put the whole edifice up in one go. It is what you might call the flat-pack mentality.

Large chunks of the season are devoted to 50-over and 20-over cricket. They require a more positive mindset and technique is less important because the white ball does not swing or deviate as much as the red.

A quick 40 can really help the team in limited-overs matches, but in Test and championship cricket that is less valuable.

What can England do to fix the problem?.

It is possible to adapt your method. Against Abbas, who bowls at only 80mph but took eight wickets in the first Test, batsmen could bat out of their crease, or ensure they take a big stride to smother the movement.

Ben Stokes did this successfully against Philander last summer. Vitally, England must try something at Headingley. It is not good enough to say that is the way I play.

They have to bat smarter. They have to think more clearly about how the bowler is trying to get him out and make it a number one priority to keep their wicket intact.

As much as they fancy driving the fourth ball they face to the boundary, they should resist it.

Expansive driving should be banned until after lunch unless its a very full (and not wide) half-volley. Pushes for two or three should suffice until the ball is older and less likely to swing.

Any batsman bowled between bat and pad should be made to do community service.

And what about county level? Truer pitches, more four-day cricket in mid-summer and bonus points for totals of 500 rather than 400 should help batsmen learn how to bat long. The social media generation.

We all know peoples concentration spans are shorter than they used to be. Batsmen are just not willing to endure slow, almost soporific periods of play when nothing happens. They constantly want to make a statement.

It is the social media generation, constantly flicking through the different platforms on their phone for instant gratification. And you know the only England player not on social media? Alastair Cook.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét