And I might add as well; I've got other arguments. Right? I've got
other arguments like the moral argument, the argument from the applicability of
mathematics to the physical world, the Leibnizian cosmological argument, the
ontological argument. So there's a lot more than what was on display here this
evening.
Very briefly cuz there are others who want to ask.
Ok, so you have many arguments to fall back on.
(Unclear)
Supposing if you had a defeater for the Holy Spirit witness,
some natural explanation for example,
then how far would you go on faith alone?
Okay now see you're still asking your psychological question.
Then how far should you go on faith alone?
I think that given that the Holy Spirit does bear witness to the truth of the
Christian faith you should go all the way with the Holy Spirit. Alvin Plantinga
talks about an intrinsic defeater of defeaters. If you have a defeater of a
belief that you hold, in order for you to continue to rationally hold to that
belief you need a defeater of the defeater. Is that clear? If you hold to a
belief and somebody brings a defeater against it, to continue to believe that
rationally you need a defeater of the defeater. But what Alvin Plantinga
points out is that some beliefs may be so powerfully warranted that they are
intrinsic defeater defeaters. That is to say the warrant for the belief itself
is so powerful it intrinsically defeats any defeaters brought against it. And he
gives the example of a person who is accused of a crime that he didn't commit,
and that he knows he didn't commit, but against whom all the evidence lies so
that a jury of his peers going simply on the basis of the evidence ought to convict
him because all the evidence is against him.
And Plantinga says, "If that happens, am I obligated to believe that I did commit
the crime after all?" "Well," he said, "obviously not! My knowledge of my own
innocence is an intrinsic defeater defeater of the evidence that
has made it look as though I have committed the crime." And in the same way
I would say in my view, now this is my view, I would say that the witness of the
Holy Spirit is an intrinsic defeater defeater so that even in the face of
unanswered objections a person is rational and should continue to believe
in the Christian faith. And I think this gives tremendous encouragement and hope
to persecuted brethren who are living, for example in communist countries like
the former Soviet Union or North Korea who have no access to apologetic
materials or books or people in Islamic countries that are persecuted have no
access to Christian materials, these people managed to have a rational faith
simply because the Holy Spirit so powerfully warrants to them the truth of
the Christian faith that it intrinsically defeats the defeaters
that Marxist propagandists and Muslim clerics bring against them.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét