-------------------------------------------
You Can Tell The Difference Between Love And Infatuation - Duration: 2:12.
Ways You Can Tell The Difference Between Love And Infatuation
I always thought infatuation was part of love. I thought they complemented each other—until I experienced both and discovered that they can't coexist. There are too many people who are convinced that they're in love with someone just because they're
amazing and they can't stop thinking about them, but the truth is most of the time the intensity that comes with really liking
someone is not love — it's infatuation. Here are some ways to tell the difference.
Infatuation happens instantly. Love is a slow process
Infatuation makes you act irrationally or 'crazy.' Love calms you down
Infatuation is intense but short-lived. Love is comfortable but lasts longer
Infatuation is reckless with our emotions. Love is more considerate
Infatuation brings out obsession and jealousy. Love brings out understanding and trust
Infatuation has ulterior motives. Love has genuine intentions
Infatuation follows a timeline. Love is timeless
Infatuation is childish. Love is mature
Infatuation grows with desire. Love grows with friendship
Infatuation stems from insecurity. Love stems from self-assurance
Infatuation makes you vengeful. Love makes you a better person
Infatuation is never content with one person. Love is monogamous
Infatuation can be self-destructive. Love can heal you
Infatuation thinks love should be perfect. Love knows it's not but it doesn't matter
-------------------------------------------
Roger Federer: Paul Annacone reveals biggest difference with Pete Sampras - Duration: 6:01.
Roger Federer: Paul Annacone reveals biggest difference with Pete Sampras
Federer and Sampras are two of the greatest names to have played on the game. The former boasts a men's record 19 Grand Slam titles, while the latter earned an impressive 14 majors during his playing days.
Annacone coached Sampras during his hay day and also in the twilight of his career. He was also present during Federer's toughest stage - the barren spell of Grand Slams in the early 2010s.
Federer won two major titles this year and finished the season as the world No 2 - a remarkable feat for a 36-year-old with his career supposedly winding down.
Roger Federer is in a different mindset and a different mode about his tennis Paul Annacone.
But Annacone believes the reason Federer has managed to keep going is down to his attitude and assuredness on court. "For Roger he has done an amazing job of keeping a similar perspective throughout his career," Annacone told Express Sport.
"When I was with him, starting in 2010 and even talking to him this year seven years later at 36 years of age, he generally perceives the losses very similarly to what he did when he was younger.
"When Pete got to the end of his career he went through something that I think most people do, which is the losses start to hurt more and the winning doesn't feel as good.
"And that's because - and this is how I felt too as a player - the winning feels normal. You get to a certain level and you expect to win. So it doesn't feel as good.
"But when you lose and you see the window of your mortality starting to close, the losses start to hurt a little bit more because you feel like the clock is ticking.
"Yet with Roger this year in particular, he did an amazing job of being able to absorb and soak in that euphoric feeling of winning.
"And the few losses that he had - he only lost five times this year - he knew how to lose with the perspective very similar to what he did when he was younger.
And that is because he has such a great sense of self.
"He has had such great good fortune in what he has been able to achieve that he is able to realise that 'look, if I win great and if I lose, I lose and go on to the next tournament'.
"Neither of these things are really going to have a huge impact in a negative way on what his legacy is." Federer's Australian Open triumph this year was his first Grand Slam since claiming the singles title at Wimbledon in 2012.
That four-year barren spell saw him reach three major finals and five semi-finals - but he just couldn't get over the line again.
That all changed in Melbourne when he beat Rafael Nadal in five sets to claim his 18th major crown.
Sampras, back in 2002, ended a two-year wait for a final major when edging Andre Agassi 6–3, 6–4, 5–7, 6–4 in the US Open final. He never played competitive tennis again.
Discussing the duo, Annacone added: "Roger has an incredible sense of self and of what he has done. "Whereas Pete at the end of his career he had a great sense of self but he went 25 months without winning a tournament.
"So he was getting to a situation where he really wanted to finish on a strong note and so frustration was starting to creep in.
"And Pete being Pete he had an amazing way to focus and regroup, which is what he did at the end of his career to win that US Open in 2002.
That was the last match he ever played, beating Andre in the final of the US Open.
"That was poetic for his career because 12 years earlier that was the stage where he jumped onto the global tennis scene when he beat Agassi at the US Open.
"Roger is in a different mindset and a different mode about his tennis.".
-------------------------------------------
Citroën C3 1.4i 5drs Difference 03-2005 ::::: Airco/El.pakket/TH - Duration: 0:47.
For more infomation >> Citroën C3 1.4i 5drs Difference 03-2005 ::::: Airco/El.pakket/TH - Duration: 0:47. -------------------------------------------
Citroën C3 1.4i 5drs Difference 03-2005 ::::: Airco/El.pakket/TH - Duration: 0:47.
For more infomation >> Citroën C3 1.4i 5drs Difference 03-2005 ::::: Airco/El.pakket/TH - Duration: 0:47. -------------------------------------------
Donald Trump doesn't know the difference between climate and weather - Duration: 3:08.
Donald Trump doesn't know the difference between climate and weather
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét