Auto news on Youtube Dec 31 2017

Dear viewer This video is comedie, chuckling

At the same time, it is not at all

Maybe it's dramatic, sad. as you like !!!

Dear viewer Thank you for your patience this short time

We hope to see your comments.

For more infomation >> The Difference Between Music On Earth And Mars - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

You Can Tell The Difference Between Love And Infatuation - Duration: 2:12.

Ways You Can Tell The Difference Between Love And Infatuation

I always thought infatuation was part of love. I thought they complemented each other—until I experienced both and discovered that they can't coexist. There are too many people who are convinced that they're in love with someone just because they're

amazing and they can't stop thinking about them, but the truth is most of the time the intensity that comes with really liking

someone is not love — it's infatuation. Here are some ways to tell the difference.

Infatuation happens instantly. Love is a slow process

Infatuation makes you act irrationally or 'crazy.' Love calms you down

Infatuation is intense but short-lived. Love is comfortable but lasts longer

Infatuation is reckless with our emotions. Love is more considerate

Infatuation brings out obsession and jealousy. Love brings out understanding and trust

Infatuation has ulterior motives. Love has genuine intentions

Infatuation follows a timeline. Love is timeless

Infatuation is childish. Love is mature

Infatuation grows with desire. Love grows with friendship

Infatuation stems from insecurity. Love stems from self-assurance

Infatuation makes you vengeful. Love makes you a better person

Infatuation is never content with one person. Love is monogamous

Infatuation can be self-destructive. Love can heal you

Infatuation thinks love should be perfect. Love knows it's not but it doesn't matter

For more infomation >> You Can Tell The Difference Between Love And Infatuation - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

Roger Federer: Paul Annacone reveals biggest difference with Pete Sampras - Duration: 6:01.

Roger Federer: Paul Annacone reveals biggest difference with Pete Sampras

Federer and Sampras are two of the greatest names to have played on the game. The former boasts a men's record 19 Grand Slam titles, while the latter earned an impressive 14 majors during his playing days.

Annacone coached Sampras during his hay day and also in the twilight of his career. He was also present during Federer's toughest stage - the barren spell of Grand Slams in the early 2010s.

Federer won two major titles this year and finished the season as the world No 2 - a remarkable feat for a 36-year-old with his career supposedly winding down.

Roger Federer is in a different mindset and a different mode about his tennis Paul Annacone.

But Annacone believes the reason Federer has managed to keep going is down to his attitude and assuredness on court. "For Roger he has done an amazing job of keeping a similar perspective throughout his career," Annacone told Express Sport.

"When I was with him, starting in 2010 and even talking to him this year seven years later at 36 years of age, he generally perceives the losses very similarly to what he did when he was younger.

"When Pete got to the end of his career he went through something that I think most people do, which is the losses start to hurt more and the winning doesn't feel as good.

"And that's because - and this is how I felt too as a player - the winning feels normal. You get to a certain level and you expect to win. So it doesn't feel as good.

"But when you lose and you see the window of your mortality starting to close, the losses start to hurt a little bit more because you feel like the clock is ticking.

"Yet with Roger this year in particular, he did an amazing job of being able to absorb and soak in that euphoric feeling of winning.

"And the few losses that he had - he only lost five times this year - he knew how to lose with the perspective very similar to what he did when he was younger.

And that is because he has such a great sense of self.

"He has had such great good fortune in what he has been able to achieve that he is able to realise that 'look, if I win great and if I lose, I lose and go on to the next tournament'.

"Neither of these things are really going to have a huge impact in a negative way on what his legacy is." Federer's Australian Open triumph this year was his first Grand Slam since claiming the singles title at Wimbledon in 2012.

That four-year barren spell saw him reach three major finals and five semi-finals - but he just couldn't get over the line again.

That all changed in Melbourne when he beat Rafael Nadal in five sets to claim his 18th major crown.

Sampras, back in 2002, ended a two-year wait for a final major when edging Andre Agassi 6–3, 6–4, 5–7, 6–4 in the US Open final. He never played competitive tennis again.

Discussing the duo, Annacone added: "Roger has an incredible sense of self and of what he has done. "Whereas Pete at the end of his career he had a great sense of self but he went 25 months without winning a tournament.

"So he was getting to a situation where he really wanted to finish on a strong note and so frustration was starting to creep in.

"And Pete being Pete he had an amazing way to focus and regroup, which is what he did at the end of his career to win that US Open in 2002.

That was the last match he ever played, beating Andre in the final of the US Open.

"That was poetic for his career because 12 years earlier that was the stage where he jumped onto the global tennis scene when he beat Agassi at the US Open.

"Roger is in a different mindset and a different mode about his tennis.".

For more infomation >> Roger Federer: Paul Annacone reveals biggest difference with Pete Sampras - Duration: 6:01.

-------------------------------------------

How to pronounce HURT, HEARD & HARD - Can you tell the difference? - Duration: 5:29.

Can you tell the difference?

Today, we are going to learn about the differences in American pronunciation between the words

"hurt," "heard," and "hard."

The first word "hurt" can be a verb, an adjective, or a noun.

As a verb, it means to cause mental or physical pain to someone.

The second word "heard" is the past tense of the verb "hear" which means to perceive

by the ear.

And the third word "hard" can be an adjective or an adverb.

As an adjective, it means solid or not soft.

It can also mean difficult to do.

To understand the differences between these words, let's compare the first two words,

"hurt," and "heard."

Both words start with an h like "huh, huh", followed by the same

"ɜr." sound like hur-t and hear-d.

Your lips should be slightly rounded and the tip of your tongue is curled as you say "hɚ."

The difference between these words lies in the last sounds of the words "t" and "d."

While the "t" sound is unvoiced, the "d" sound is voiced.

When you make a voiced sound such as the "d" sound, your throat vibrates.

You can make the "t" sound by pushing air through the opening of your mouth without

causing the throat to vibrate.

Next, we are going to compare the words "hard" and "heard."

To say "hard," you need to open your mouth bigger and drop your jaw little more, compared

to the pronunciation of "hurt" and "heard."

And the "HAR" sound like /hɑɚd/ should be coming from the back of your mouth.

That's the only difference between these words and both words end with the same soft d sound.

Let me demonstrate how to pronounce these words.

Please pay close attention to the shape of my lips and the position of my jaw and tongue.

hur-, hur-, hurt

hear-, hear-, heard

har-, har-, hard

hur-, hur-, hurt

hear-, hear-, heard

har-, har-, hard

Now, I am going to give you a quiz.

I will pick one of the three words and say it three times.

Please listen carefully and tell me which word I am pronouncing next.

I hope you could tell the differences and picked the word "hard" for your answer.

We have another question for you.

I am going to read a sentence twice that contains one of the three words.

Your job is to tell me which word I am using in the sentence.

The answer is "hurt."

I hope this was an easy question for you because, grammatically, the word "hurt" is the

only correct choice for this sentence out of the three words.

If somebody said, "I didn't want to heard him."

or "I didn't want to hard him," these sentences would be grammatically incorrect.

So, in most cases, knowing the correct English grammar can help your listening comprehension.

Okay?

I have one more question.

This time, I will read a sentence that contains two of the three words.

I'll say the sentence three times and give you a little hint each time.

I'd like you to tell me which words are used in what parts of the sentence.

Okay, let's begin.

And the answer is, I heard her say, "I'm hard of hearing."

The phrase "hard of hearing" means having a partial loss of hearing.

In other words, it is difficult for the woman to hear what people are saying because she

has partially lost her ability to hear sounds.

Well, that's it for today.

If you didn't answer all of the questions correctly, watch this video over and over

until you can tell the differences between these words.

Thank you for watching and see you next time.